Woman Charged with False Rape Report After Athletes Secretly Videotape Her Extortion Attempt

In February, Sherri Ann Urbanic-Bach was charged with filing a false rape report, attempted extortion and prostitution in a case involving players with the St. John’s basketball team.

The basketball team travelled to Pittsburgh on February 4 where it played, and lost, to Pittsburgh 71-51. Around 2:30 a.m., several players met Urbanic-Bach and they went back to a hotel room where she had sex with a number of the players. Around 4:15 a.m., however, Urbanic-Bach called police and reported that she had been gang raped by the basketball players.

When police went to interview the players, however, the woman’s story was undone by a cell phone that one of the players had used to record part of their encounter with the women. The video showed the threatening the players that she would go to police and invent a rape story if they did not pay her the $600 that they had previously agreed to in exchange for sex.

Although all charges against the men were dropped, St. John’s expelled one of the players, permanently suspended another, and forced lesser disciplinary measures on the other four players.

Sources:

Woman felt ‘violated’ when players refused to pay for sex. Jonathan D. Silver, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, February 6, 2004.

Woman Lied About Gang Rape by Players. Associated Press, February 6, 2004.

Johnnies on the sex spot. ROGER RUBIN, FERNANDA SANTOS, and DAVE GOLDINER, New York Daily News, February 6, 2004.

Tables Turned in Rape Investigation. CNN, January 6, 2004.

Woman charged with lying about gang rape. Associated Press, February 6, 2004.

Rape Allegation Adds to St. John’s Woes. Mike Crissey, Associated Press, February 6, 2004.

Share

Saskatchewan Agrees to $1.5 Million Interim Payment for Klassens

Back in December, a Canadian court ruled that 12 members of the Klassen family prosecuted in a series of ritual abuse cases had been the subject of “malicious prosecution” (see Saskatchewan Government Says It’s Not Sorry for Malicious Prosecution). In February, the Saskatchewan government agreed to pay the Klassens an interim $1.5 million payment, with more compensation — though not necessarily an apology — coming.

That came after a judge ordered Saskatchewan to enter into settlement talks with the Klassens despite the government’s ongoing appeal of the December ruling. In fact, Saskatchewan Justice Minister Frank Quennell was quick to point out that by paying the $1.5 million, the government was not admitting fault. Quennell told the CBC,

These are not monies being paid in respect to damages, or in respect to any liability. The government is not subject to the result of the appeal, is not liable to pay this amount of money.

For his part, the most famous of the defendants, Richard Klassen, said that the payment of the money is an acknowledgement of his family’s innocence, although he still wants an apology from the government,

It’s been a long time. So what went through my mind was a little bit of satisfaction and, well, acknowledgement. It’s one thing to be acknowledged that you’re innocent, but, I mean, taking away a little bit of the suffering helps.

Quennell might not think that police and the government were malicious, but according to the CBC, in early February “two executive members of Frank Quennell’s constituency office resigned in disgust over the way the Klassens have been treated by the Justice Department.”

Source:

Government gives Klassens $1.5M. CBC Saskatchewan, February 5, 2004.

Share

Woman Pleads Guilty After Leaving Ill Husband to Go to Las Vegas with Boyfriend

A 45-year-old Barkhamsted, Connecticut woman was sentenced to 45 days in jail after pleading guilty to a charge of cruelty to persons in the death of her husband.

Nancy Roy was charged for leaving her husband at home on January 11, 2003, when he was either dying or dead, and travelling to Las Vegas for an overnight gambling trip with her boyfriend (the couple were estranged and seeing other people, although they continued to live together and had not divorced). Roy apparently did not notice that her husband had died until the morning after returning from her gambling trip.

Roy told police that her husband wasn’t feeling well when she went to work the morning of January 11, and that she wasn’t suspicious that when she returned from work that he was “sleeping” in the exactly the same position as when she left. She claimed that she thought the foul odor she notice upon returning from Las Vegas was simply her husband’s body odor rather than a decomposing body.

After pleading guilty to cruelty to prisons, Judge Elizabeth Bozzuto told Roy,

You showed a total disregard for the welfare and dignity of another human being and that should not be tolerated in this society.

Roy’s boyfriend, Thomas Caves, told the Hartford Courant that Roy plead guilty in order to get the whole mess behind her.

Sources:

Wife sentenced for ignoring ill husband. Associated Press, January 21, 2004.

Widow’s friend speaks out. David Owens, Hartford Courant, January 23, 2004.

Share

Canadian Woman Acquitted in False Sexual Abuse Allegation Case

In mid-January, Mary Masson, 29, was acquitted on charges of making false sexual abuse charges against her former husband in one of the more bizarre such cases.

In 2002, Masson left her husband, Jean-Yves Masson. She then told her sister-in-law and police that in 1999 she discovered a videotape that her then-fiancee had made of him sexual abusing their daughter. She claimed that she had forced her fiance to write a confession to that effect, and wrapped the confession around the videotape which she then placed in an attic.

Police doubted her story almost from the moment she said it, finding it difficult to believe that Mary would marry Jean-Yves and repeatedly leave him alone with their daughter if the claim were true. When police searched the attic, they found no tape and after an investigation charged Mary Masson with making a false accusation.

Most damning was Mary’s statement to police that she discovered the videotape while she was on the phone with a friend, Jennifer Dekievit. According to Mary, she had screamed while on the phone to Dekievit and later met with her to discuss the videotape.

But Dekievit testified that the phone conversation never took place and that Mary Masson never told her about any video showing Mary’s fiance sexually abusing the daughter. Dekievet testified that she too had left her child alone with Jean-Yves and said,

I would never be so desperate as to leave my daughter with someone I suspected (of child abuse). . . . I don’t recall any incident where she screamed like a blood-curdling scream. It’s not something I would have ever forgotten.

In acquitting Mary Masson, Justice Russell Merredew said,

Notwithstanding Det. James Davies’ healthy skepticism and not without skepticism in my own mind, I cannot find her guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Sources:

Not guilty of mischief. Sean McKibbon, Ottawa Sun, January 15, 2004.

Former Friend Denies Hearing Of Sex Video. Sean McKibbon, Ottawa Sun, November 14, 2003.

Cops Questioned Sex-Abuse Accusation. Sean McKibbon, Ottawa Sun, November 13, 2003.

Share

Man Acquitted on Charges of Performing Oral Sex without Girlfriend’s Consent

The Nova Scotia Chronicle Herald reports that a jury in Sydney deliberated only 10 minutes to find a man not guilty of performing oral sex on his girlfriend without her consent. Apparently prosecutors in Canada don’t have much real crime to prosecute if they can devote resources to such ludicrous cases.

After having what the Chronicle Herald characterized as a “bitter fight” with her boyfriend, the woman went to police and reported that five days earlier she had awoken to find her boyfriend performing oral sex on her. The boyfriend testified that the woman was, in fact, awake throughout the sex act and, in fact, “moving around . . . [and] moaning.”

Apparently the jury found the case groan-inducing as well.

Source:

Cape Breton man found not guilty in oral sex case. The Chronicle Herald (Nova Scotia), January 29, 2004.

Share

Tokyo to Prohibit Sale of Used Underwear from Young Schoolgirls

The Telegraph reports that Tokyo is in the process of amending its laws in order to forbid sex shops there from reselling used underwear from girls under the age of 16. In case you were curious, a pair of used girl’s underwear sells for about 25 pounds according to the Telegraph.

According to the Telegraph,

The shops also sell swimsuits, gym knickers and schoolgirl uniforms, which resemble sailor outfits.

Prostitution involving underage girls is apparently a serious problem in Tokyo, and the city is banning the sale of used underwear by young girls as part of its efforts to crackdown on the problem. But why not just ban the sale of any used underwear on health grounds? Weird.

Source:

Tokyo calls for ban on sale of used schoolgirls’ underwear. Colin Joyce, Telegraph (UK), January 16, 2004.

Share