French Appeals Court Rules Driver Can’t Be Charged With Killing Pregnant Woman’s Fetus

A French appeals court ruled in February that a driver who caused the death of a pregnant woman and the fetus she was carrying cannot be charged with two counts of manslaughter in the accident.

In October 2003, a van driven by Kevin Germon, 30, struck a car that Florinda Braganca, 34, was riding in. Braganca, who was 22 weeks pregnant, was killed instantly.

Germon was sentenced to one year in jail for his role in the accident, but prosecutors sought to charge him in the death of the 22-week-old fetus as well. They argued that the law should recognize that the fetus was “a human being from the moment of conception.”

But the appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that the fetus could not be considered a crime victim, barring prosecution of Germon on a possible second manslaughter charge.

The oddest thing about this case is the relatively short sentence Germon received for killing Braganca, especially given that drug tests found cannabis in his system at the time of the accident.

Sources:

French unborn death ‘not a crime’. The BBC, February 17, 2005.

French court rejects ‘homicide’ of unborn foetus. Agence France Presse, February 17, 2005.

Share

France Deports Imam Who Defended Domestic Violence

After a miscue earlier this year, in October France deported Muslim imam Abdelkader Bouziane after Bouziane made comments in defense of domestic violence in a magazine interview.

Bouziane, who has Algerian citizenship, was quoted in Lyon Magazine in early 2004 as saying that “beating your wife is authorized by the Koran.”

Bouziane was arrested in February and deported in April for inciting violence against women. That deportation was overruled by courts, however, and Bouziane was allowed to re-enter the country in May. The government appealed that ruling and on October 4 a higher administrative court ruled that the deportation order was proper, and Bouziane was arrested and put on a flight to Algeria on October 5.

Bouziane’s lawyer told Agence-France Presse that his client disputed the accuracy of the quotes in the interview saying, “Mr. Bouziane contests the passages which caused trouble or infuriated women in France, for he was only making reference to the Koran.”

Mohamed Bechari, the head of the National Federation of French Muslims, told Agence-France Presse that his organization did not approve of the comments attributed to Bouziane,

The associations should sack imams like him. We condemn this type of slip, which shows a fundamentalist reading of the Koranic text that is not part of Islam nor the Muslims in France.

Bechari added that Bouziane’s views do not reflect those of the general population of Muslims in France.

Source:

France deports controversial imam. The BBC, October 5, 2004.

Imam’s claim that wife-beating is Koranic earns him deportation from France. Agence-France Presse, April 21, 2004.

Radical Muslim Cleric, Deported For Backing Wife-Beating, Returns To France. Agence-France Presse, May 22, 2004.

France Deports Muslim Cleric Who ‘Defended Wife-Beating’. Jean-Pierre Benoit, Agence France Presse, October 6, 2004.

Share

Controversy in France Over Muslim Students Wearing Headscarfs

In the past few months a controversy over Muslim women and girls wearing headscarfs has heated up again in France.

On the one hand, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy angered some Muslims in France when he insisted that women having their photographs taken for France’s national identity card would have to remove their headscarfs. Sarkozy was booed at a gathering of 10,00 Muslims at the Union of Islamic Organizations in France. On this point, Sarkozy is correct. Leaving aside problems with national identity cards themselves, requiring Muslim women not to cover their heads in scarves for such photographs seems sensible and uncontroversial enough.

On the other hand, many in France want to go much further. Specifically, they want to ban young Muslim girls from wearing head scarves to school. Educator in France are angered by this continued practice, and French Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin said he supported a ban on the wearing of headscarfs.

MP Jacque Myard told La Chine Info TV that Muslims wearing headscarfs in school was “incompatible with the neutrality of the school and the French Republic.” According to the BBC there is actually a “1994 instruction from the Education Minister [that] says the ‘ostentatious display of religious allegiance’ in state educational institutions should be prevented.”

That sounds like straightforward anti-Muslim bigotry. The BBC reports that Education Minister Luc Ferry has “pledged to introduce a new law next year that would reassert secular values in state schools.” Translation: the new law will shove secularism down the throat of the Muslim minority whether they like it or not.

Source:

Headscarf row erupts in France. Magali Faure and Philip Gouge, The BBC, April 25, 2003.

Share

France Overturns Controversial Right Not to Be Born Ruling

Earlier this month I noted that French gynecologists were refusing to do ultrasound scans for new patients after a French judge ruled in favor of a child who sued on the grounds that he never should have been born. An ultrasound scan failed to catch the boy’s birth defect, and he argued successfully in court that since his mother would have aborted him had she known about the birth defect, he was due compensation from the gynecologist who performed the scan.

France’s parliament passed a bill just a few days after the announced strike that affirms that “nobody can claim to have been harmed simply by being born.” The bill will still allow parents to seek damages, but only if they can prove that a doctor made a “blatant error” in interpreting the ultrasound scan.

Source:

France rejects ‘right not to be born.’ The BBC, January 10, 2002.

Share

French Gynecologists Refuse to Perform Ultrasounds in Wake of Abortion Ruling

Last summer, France became the first country to my knowledge to rule that there was such a thing as a right not to be born. Now, French gynecologists are refusing to do ultrasound scans of pregnant women out of fears they will be held liable if they make a mistake.

In the case that set this precedent, a gynecologist doing an ultrasound did not notice that the fetus had Down’s Syndrome. The child sued the doctors on the grounds that his mother would have aborted him if she had known he would have Down’s. The child won in court and France’s highest appellate court upheld the verdict.

Since then, three other cases have been allowed to proceed where doctors are beings ued on behalf of children with birth defects that may have been detectable in ultraound procedures.

In response, gynecologists are refusing to perform ultrasound scans on any newly pregnant women (though they will perform scans on pregnant women who are already under their care). The doctors rightly note that even when performed correctly, there is no guarantee that a potential birth defect will be detected by ultrasound techniques. It is a very useful tool, but hardly a magic bullet for detecting things like Down’s Syndrome.

According to the BBC, the French government plans to offer some sort of protection from liability for gynecologists, but when this might happen remains to be seen. In the meantime, the odd result of the “right not to exist” cases is that they will likely put many more children at risk by turning a useful diagnostic tool into a weapon with which to bludgeon and bankrupt doctors.

Source:

Scan strike by French doctors. The BBC, January 3, 2002.

Share