<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EquityFeminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.equityfeminism.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Betty Dodson Rips &#8220;The Vagina Monologues&#8221; by the overthrow of existing conditions &#171; hld6</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/betty-dodson-rips-the-vagina-monologues/comment-page-1/#comment-67931</link>
		<dc:creator>the overthrow of existing conditions &#171; hld6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=449#comment-67931</guid>
		<description>[...] strategy. I learned that some others in the feminist community were also critical, including one prominent sex therapist who claims her masturbation workshops were misrepresented in a way that made them sound more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] strategy. I learned that some others in the feminist community were also critical, including one prominent sex therapist who claims her masturbation workshops were misrepresented in a way that made them sound more [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Sims&#8217; Noxious Version of Traditionalist Anti-Feminism by acidtoyman</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/david-sims-noxious-version-of-traditionalist-anti-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-67914</link>
		<dc:creator>acidtoyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 10:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=439#comment-67914</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/david-sims-noxious-version-of-traditionalist-anti-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-67911&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian Carnell&lt;/a&gt;: 

Sarcasm does absolute zero to support the &quot;veractiy&quot; of an argument; nor is there any lack of it on the internet, is there?

Why on Earth should anyone put any weight whatsoever into the claims this author has made when they can&#039;t even be bothered to get the name of the person they&#039;re attacking right?  We&#039;re not talking typos here---we&#039;re talking REPEATEDLY getting the name of the SUBJECT of your attack wrong throughout the article---INCLUDING in the title.  That level of sloppiness hardly gives anyone any reason to put any trust in the &quot;veracity&quot; of your argument.  For instance, it hardly gives one confidence that you&#039;ve given due weight to the subtleties of wording in the subject&#039;s original argument before rebutting it if you can&#039;t even be bothered to pay attention to a &quot;tiny detail&quot; like a PERSON&#039;S NAME (especially when that person is as well-known in his community as Sim).

Now you can rebut *that*, or you could resort once again to pointless, empty (and far too easy) sarcasm---or, most likely, you&#039;ll just pretend you never read this and pass it silently by.  Which ever way, after witnessing the sloppiness of your original post, and the complete and utter emptiness of your reply, I&#039;m pretty much convinced that you have *nothing of value* to say.

Funny, because I do think Sim&#039;s writing and &quot;thinking&quot; on the subject of feminism are extremely wrongheaded (to be far too charitably polite about it).  I&#039;m certainly not on Sim&#039;s side, but given your combination of sloppiness and pointless sarcasm, and the fact that you don&#039;t even care that you made a mistake, I sure ain&#039;t on your side, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/david-sims-noxious-version-of-traditionalist-anti-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-67911" rel="nofollow">Brian Carnell</a>: </p>
<p>Sarcasm does absolute zero to support the &#8220;veractiy&#8221; of an argument; nor is there any lack of it on the internet, is there?</p>
<p>Why on Earth should anyone put any weight whatsoever into the claims this author has made when they can&#8217;t even be bothered to get the name of the person they&#8217;re attacking right?  We&#8217;re not talking typos here&#8212;we&#8217;re talking REPEATEDLY getting the name of the SUBJECT of your attack wrong throughout the article&#8212;INCLUDING in the title.  That level of sloppiness hardly gives anyone any reason to put any trust in the &#8220;veracity&#8221; of your argument.  For instance, it hardly gives one confidence that you&#8217;ve given due weight to the subtleties of wording in the subject&#8217;s original argument before rebutting it if you can&#8217;t even be bothered to pay attention to a &#8220;tiny detail&#8221; like a PERSON&#8217;S NAME (especially when that person is as well-known in his community as Sim).</p>
<p>Now you can rebut *that*, or you could resort once again to pointless, empty (and far too easy) sarcasm&#8212;or, most likely, you&#8217;ll just pretend you never read this and pass it silently by.  Which ever way, after witnessing the sloppiness of your original post, and the complete and utter emptiness of your reply, I&#8217;m pretty much convinced that you have *nothing of value* to say.</p>
<p>Funny, because I do think Sim&#8217;s writing and &#8220;thinking&#8221; on the subject of feminism are extremely wrongheaded (to be far too charitably polite about it).  I&#8217;m certainly not on Sim&#8217;s side, but given your combination of sloppiness and pointless sarcasm, and the fact that you don&#8217;t even care that you made a mistake, I sure ain&#8217;t on your side, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Sims&#8217; Noxious Version of Traditionalist Anti-Feminism by Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/david-sims-noxious-version-of-traditionalist-anti-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-67911</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 01:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=439#comment-67911</guid>
		<description>Oh man, you&#039;re right. This post is a classic example of the Bingo Was His Name-o Fallacy. I completely forgot that we judge the veracity of arguments based on whether or not a person&#039;s name is spelled correctly. Thank goodness the Internet is filled with skilled logicians such as yourself to point this out and keep bloggers honest.

My hat goes off to you, sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, you&#8217;re right. This post is a classic example of the Bingo Was His Name-o Fallacy. I completely forgot that we judge the veracity of arguments based on whether or not a person&#8217;s name is spelled correctly. Thank goodness the Internet is filled with skilled logicians such as yourself to point this out and keep bloggers honest.</p>
<p>My hat goes off to you, sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on David Sims&#8217; Noxious Version of Traditionalist Anti-Feminism by acidtoyman</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/david-sims-noxious-version-of-traditionalist-anti-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-67910</link>
		<dc:creator>acidtoyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 07:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=439#comment-67910</guid>
		<description>Jesus, do you know how much credibility it sucks out of your post when you can&#039;t even spell the guy&#039;s name right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, do you know how much credibility it sucks out of your post when you can&#8217;t even spell the guy&#8217;s name right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Good Rape&#8221;: The Vagina Monologues Returns by The heroine in Eve Ensler&#8217;s next play - mumblings and ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2000/the-good-rape-the-vagina-monologues-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-67897</link>
		<dc:creator>The heroine in Eve Ensler&#8217;s next play - mumblings and ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=549#comment-67897</guid>
		<description>[...] Given her history, I predict Eve Ensler will make Patricia Dye the hero of her next play.  An Ohio woman who posed as a teenage boy and convinced a 16-year-old girl to run away with her was sentenced Wednesday to six months in jail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Given her history, I predict Eve Ensler will make Patricia Dye the hero of her next play.  An Ohio woman who posed as a teenage boy and convinced a 16-year-old girl to run away with her was sentenced Wednesday to six months in jail. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fathers Rights Activist: I Only Hit My Wife In Self-Defense by Celine</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2005/fathers-rights-activist-i-only-hit-my-wife-in-self-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-67807</link>
		<dc:creator>Celine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 07:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=48#comment-67807</guid>
		<description>That is only one side of the story.  Why do you have to be so biased?  You could at least give both sides of the story, before judging someone for something that they perhaps did not do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is only one side of the story.  Why do you have to be so biased?  You could at least give both sides of the story, before judging someone for something that they perhaps did not do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rape By Book Review by JenD</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/1994/rape-by-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-67536</link>
		<dc:creator>JenD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=604#comment-67536</guid>
		<description>Can someone please help me find out who I can contact from this website in order to have a newspaper article from 4 years ago removed from this site?  Please post a comment with the information.  Thank you.

JenD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please help me find out who I can contact from this website in order to have a newspaper article from 4 years ago removed from this site?  Please post a comment with the information.  Thank you.</p>
<p>JenD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bonobos, Chimpanzees, and Maureen Dowd by Sammy Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2002/bonobos-chimpanzees-and-maureen-dowd/comment-page-1/#comment-67480</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=313#comment-67480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;check mine out......&lt;/strong&gt;

keep up the good work man.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p><strong>check mine out&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>keep up the good work man&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Surrendered Wife Phenomena by Why Hate The Surrendered Wife? &#171; Another God Feering Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2001/the-surrendered-wife-phenomena/comment-page-1/#comment-67472</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Hate The Surrendered Wife? &#171; Another God Feering Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=477#comment-67472</guid>
		<description>[...] Hate The Surrendered&#160;Wife?  I keep reading how all kindsof people hate this book. I jus dont get it. For a while I thought it was just jelousy, but thats not it. Heres how I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] Hate The Surrendered&nbsp;Wife?  I keep reading how all kindsof people hate this book. I jus dont get it. For a while I thought it was just jelousy, but thats not it. Heres how I [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bonobos, Chimpanzees, and Maureen Dowd by Baseball Crank</title>
		<link>http://www.equityfeminism.com/articles/2002/bonobos-chimpanzees-and-maureen-dowd/comment-page-1/#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball Crank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://equityfeminism.devilsadvocate.org/?p=313#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BLOG:  Quick Links 7/30/07...&lt;/strong&gt;

*Pedro Feliciano&#039;s meltdown on Saturday can probably just be chalked up to nobody being perfect (Wagner, whose ERA is down to 1.39, is almost certainly overdue for one of those games), but with Joe Smith down in the minors, it&#039;s......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p><strong>BLOG:  Quick Links 7/30/07&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>*Pedro Feliciano&#8217;s meltdown on Saturday can probably just be chalked up to nobody being perfect (Wagner, whose ERA is down to 1.39, is almost certainly overdue for one of those games), but with Joe Smith down in the minors, it&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

